Decisions supported by multiple perspectives of different observation ranges
Judgments supported by Multiple perspectives of [different ranges of observation
Derivative content from [We cannot know the totality of what others know.
If Mr. A says that he prefers Option X based on his Observation range information
Mr. B doesn't think option X is a good idea based on his observations.
In this case, Mr. B will not adopt Mr. A's proposal X
If Mr. A really believes that incorporating option X will benefit B, it is better to share with B the information that will provide the basis for believing so.
Share the decision-making process, not the results of the decision.
[Good decisions are supported by many facts.
Since A does not do so, B decides that A is just saying that without any particular basis.
This could be a symmetrical relationship.
https://gyazo.com/4a273e9d19a2d9725af201a0a3fa59ba
Both parties believe the other's judgment is not well-founded.
B also asked A, "Why do you think that's a good idea?" It is more productive to ask
Don't wait for A to give it to you first, just go get it.
Well, there are a myriad of people, so I thought it would be reasonable to give preference to those who seem to be able to converse productively, rather than those who are strongly advocating for it.
relevance
Decisions supported by multiple perspectives
I don't think we're airing each other out.
read the situation
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/異なる観測範囲の複数の視点に支えられた判断 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.